Search Results for "revenue tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "revenue tribunal"

3280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3280 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.

5 Dec 2022

The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

1 Nov 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Tax Exemption and Classification of Lease Transactions in Income Tax Reference concerning Scientific Research Centre. Assessee's claim for exemption under Section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 hinges on whether activities constitute general public utility, whether construction and letting out of World Trade Centre amounts to business, and whether receipts are revenue in nature.

25 Oct 2012

The Income Tax Reference No. 78 of 1998 arose from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's common order dated 29th March, 1996, for assessment years 1989-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Refusal to Stay Redemption Fine. Holds that Customs Tribunal Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Redemption Fine Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962, as Section 129E Does Not Apply.

8 Dec 2017

The appellant, Mydream Properties Private Limited, imported a yacht and VSAT equipment, against which the Commissioner of Customs passed an order-in-o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitution of Special Bench by ITAT President on CBDT Request in Income Tax Appeal. Power under Section 255(3) of Income Tax Act is Administrative and Not Subject to Prior Hearing or Natural Justice.

10 Aug 2015

The petitioner, M/s Jagati Publications Ltd., a public limited company publishing a Telugu newspaper, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Recovery Case - Clarifies No Separate Section 11A Notice Required When Refund Order Reviewed Under Section 35E. Recovery of erroneous refund granted through speaking order reviewed under Section 35E of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not require separate show cause notice under Section 11A, as Sections 35E and 11A operate in different fields with different purposes and time limits.

24 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from the respondent company's manufacture of cotton yarn consumed captively in its composite mills for weaving fabric. Followin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

23 Jul 2018

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal against Bangalore Bench of ITAT lies only before Karnataka High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

26 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)