Search Results for "retrospective demand"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Rent Default. Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over a Decade, No Dispute as to Standard Rent or Permitted Increases, Case Falls Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act.

The dispute pertains to a suit for eviction filed by the landlady, Mrs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, against the tenant, Sudhir Kumar Sengupta (since decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...