Search Results for "refundable security deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "refundable security deposit"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

High Court declined to quash FIR in Land Fraud Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 though Civil Nature of Dispute and Complaint by Power of Attorney Holder is sustained

30 Jan 2026

The petitioner, accused No. 8 in a land fraud case, sought quashing of FIR registered under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

14 Feb 2020

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Construction Firm and HAL Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Both parties consented to appointment of arbitrator from panel of Arbitration Centre - Karnataka.

20 Sep 2018

The petitioner, M/s V.K.A. Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)