Search Results for "recreational area"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Co-operative Society's Levy of Cultural Activity Charges. Resolution passed in Annual General Meeting for mandatory cultural charges is permissible under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Model Bye-Laws.

The petitioner, Mrs. Jyoti Sharadchandra Lohokare, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Societies Challenging Police Station Construction on Amenity Plot. Construction of Police Station on Reserved Amenity Plot Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act and DCR.

The petitioners, three cooperative housing societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...