Search Results for "reassessment order"

734 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 734 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petition Contended That Reopening Was Barred by Limitation and Without Jurisdiction; Court Examined the First Proviso to Section 147 and the Requirement of Full Disclosure.

The petitioner, a company engaged in software development and providing services to foreign clients, challenged the reopening of its assessment for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Relied-Upon Documents in Section 148A Proceedings Renders Reassessment Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Shah Nanchandbhai Ranchhoddas Choksi, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 30.06.2025 issued under Section 148 of the Income-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates upon Writ Petitions Challenging Re-Assessment Proceedings for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Court Analyzes Whether Notices are Barred by Limitation and Whether Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewlett Packard Globalsoft Private Limited), a company engaged in export of software services a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...