Search Results for "procedural delay"

1978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Revision Against Eviction Decree. Inordinate delay of over 4 years not sufficiently explained despite government status and pandemic.

The State of Maharashtra and the Commissioner of Police filed an Interim Application seeking condonation of delay of 1 year and 300 days in filing a C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition on Removal from TPE Caution List: Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Guidelines. Court Reserves Orders after Considering Petitioner's Grievance Regarding Inclusion in Caution List Without Proper Forum Evaluation.

The petitioner, a chartered engineer and government-approved valuer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...