Search Results for "prima facie material"

6788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to CBI FIR Against Former Home Minister in Corruption Case. Petition Seeks Quashing of FIR Registered Under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120-B IPC Based on Alleged Lack of Prima Facie Offence and Statutory Bars.

The writ petition was filed by Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh, former Home Minister of Maharashtra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Cheating and Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Deception from Inception. Promise to Marry Not Fulfilled Does Not Constitute Rape or Cheating When Relationship Was Consensual and Prosecutrix Was Aware of Accused's Marital Status.

The petitioner, Siddharth Narendra Banthia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3rd Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Tenancy Possession Dispute; Considers Whether Temporary Restraint Order Was Justified

The case arose from a tenancy and possession dispute over Flat No.5, Second Floor, Goolestan, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. The plaintiff, a senior citizen an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...