Search Results for "presumption under POCSO Act"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay in FIR. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Testimony of Victim and Witnesses Contained Material Contradictions and Medical Evidence Did Not Corroborate Allegations.

The appellant, Manohar Tikaram Kapgate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 448 and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Unexplained Delay. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 4, 6, 10 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Murlidhar Lonbale, was convicted by the Special Judge under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR was unexplained.

The appellant, Ganesh Kisan Navale, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) for sex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR — Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Guruprasad Daulat Bhalavi, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case 224/2016 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Chandkha s/o Ibrahimkha Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hinganghat, in Special (Child) Case 1 of 2017 for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witnesses and Lack of Evidence of Sexual Assault. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Natthuji Raut, was convicted by the Special Judge, Yavatmal, for offences under Sections 451, 376(2)(i)(j)(1) of the Indian P...