Search Results for "possession prayer"

4369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.

The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Eviction of Licensee in Landmark Tenancy Case. Interpretation of Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act Clarified: Shared Licenses Do Not Confer Tenancy Rights.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Petitioners, legal heir of the original defendant, confirming the eviction order passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Easement of Necessity Over Cart Track in Partition Dispute Between Brothers. Plaintiff Granted Declaration and Mandatory Injunction for Access to Landlocked Property Under Section 13 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit between two brothers, T.M. Thiruvenkatasamy (defendant) and M.Sundararajan (plaintiff), concerning f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...