FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006
26 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "permit contravention"
619 result(s) found
Found 619 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner with Valid Learner's Licence Not Liable for Compensation; Insurance Company Directed to Pay and Recover. Learner's Licence Held Valid Driving Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Breach of Rule 3 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Not Established as No Evidence of Contravention.
3 Feb 2025The appellant, Ku. Nilima Dakhane, was the owner of a Kinetic Nova scooter involved in an accident on 10.04.2003, in which respondent No.2, Pandurang ...
- 711
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.
23 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...
- 661
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.
12 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection List for Ayurvedic Medical Officer Posts. Court holds that the selection process was fair and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the preparation of the merit list.
30 Aug 2022The petitioner, a BAMS qualified doctor working temporarily under the National Health Mission, challenged the selection list for 9 posts of Ayurvedic ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Award in Property Dispute — Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Allowed on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitrator's computation of amounts and interest under clause 9 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements was patently illegal and contrary to the terms of the contract.
23 Aug 2022The petitioners, Dhiraj Lakhamashi Shah and another, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an in...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award on Repairs and Interest. The court upheld the Single Judge's order setting aside findings on repairs as perverse and reduced interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum.
18 Aug 2022The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd against an order of the le...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.
1 Feb 2022The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...
- 145
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Partners in Essential Commodities Act Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement in Illegal Storage of Gas Cylinders. Statement of Co-Accused Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act Inadmissible Against Co-Accused Without Independent Corroboration Under Section 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
18 Jan 2021The petitioners, partners of Khandre Trading Corporation, an agent of Hindustan Petroleum (HP), were arraigned as accused in a case registered under S...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 302
