Search Results for "pension fixation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "pension fixation"

291 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits in Bank Employee Resignation Case — Resignation on Health Grounds Treated as Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Regulations. The court held that resignation due to ill-health after 26 years of service can be treated as voluntary retirement under Regulation 22 of the Bank of India Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995, entitling the employee to pension.

21 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Mrs. Sheroo Shapurji (now Mrs. Sheroo Mistry), worked with the Bank of India for 26 years from 1965 to 1991. On 25 February 1991, she ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Overpayment from Retired Teacher's Terminal Benefits. Overpayment due to wrong pay fixation under Sixth Pay Commission cannot be recovered after retirement, especially when no misrepresentation by employee.

7 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Issak Abbas Hawaldar, was appointed as a Primary Teacher in Panchayat Samiti, Arale, in November 1976 as a Class-IV employee. He retir...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Government Employee — Holds That Time-Bound Promotion Granted Prior to Cut-Off Date Is Protected Under Government Resolution. The Court set aside the recovery of Rs.63,765/- and restored the appellant's pension as originally fixed, finding that the Government Resolution dated 8th February 1999 protected promotions granted before 31st December 1995.

21 Aug 2024

The appellant, Jagdish Prasad Singh, was appointed as Supply Inspector in the Government of Bihar in 1966. He received a time-bound promotion as Marke...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Management's Appeal in Service Regulation Dispute Over Annual Increment. Employees Entitled to Increment Earned One Day Before Retirement Under Regulation 40(1) of Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997, as They Completed Required Service Period.

11 Apr 2023

The dispute arose between the management of KPTCL and its employees regarding the entitlement to an annual increment earned one day prior to retiremen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Hears Reference on Pension Entitlement of Part-Time Lecturers Under Government Resolution, 21 July 1983. Interpretation of Whether the Resolution Excludes Part-Timers Who Work Full-Time Equivalent Across Two Different Managements is at Issue.

20 Oct 2006

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by a part-time lecturer in Hindi who had rendered services in two different aided colleges and claimed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pensionary Benefits Case — Advance Increment Recovery Set Aside. Recovery of Rs.67,918/- from pensionary benefits of a retired Lower Division Clerk quashed as recovery from a Class III employee after superannuation is impermissible under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Manohar Bappaji Gaikwad, was a Lower Division Clerk working with the Civil Court at Kallam, District Osmanabad. On 21.11.2006, he rece...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Laboratory Attendants Against Premature Retirement. Class IV/Group D Employees Entitled to Retirement at Age 60 Under Rule 10.2 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

25 Jul 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Laboratory Attendants (Samadhan Umak and Maroti Dhote) employed with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi V...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Retired Medical Officer's Petition against Recovery of Excess Pay under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Recovery Upheld Because Officer Had Given Undertaking and Was Not a Class-III or IV Employee. The Court held that the protections against recovery from retired employees under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih do not apply when the employee has given an undertaking to refund excess payments, and Rule 134A of the Pension Rules expressly permits such recovery.

10 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Shamrao Darunte, retired as a Medical Officer on 31 July 2015. The Accountant General (A&E), respondent No. 3, acting on ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim for Class-IV Post with Regular Pay Scale, Quashes Forfeiture of Past Service and Fixed Salary Condition. The court held that conditions forfeiting earlier service and providing fixed salary are arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

6 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Dinesh Kanjibhai Rathava, filed a writ petition under Articles 14 and 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the conditions in o...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)