Search Results for "penetration"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of 8-Year-Old Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded for the rape of an 8-year-old girl unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Penetration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded, for the offence of rape under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds 14-Year Sentence for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor. Evidence of Child Victim and Mother Found Credible, Corroborated by Medical and DNA Evidence, Conviction Under Section 6 POCSO Act and Section 342 IPC Affirmed.

The appellant, Kailas Gangaprasad Yadav, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No. 266 of 2014...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Sexual Assault of Minor Boy Under Goa Children's Act, POCSO Act, and IPC Section 377. Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault and Carnal Intercourse Against Order of Nature.

The appellant, Girish Shirodkar, was convicted by the Children's Court, Goa, for offences under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003, Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Raping Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act. Life imprisonment confirmed for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 POCSO Act, but conviction under Section 376d IPC set aside for lack of evidence of gang rape.

The appellant, Mohd. Zakir Habib Khan, was convicted by the Special Court under the POCSO Act for sexually abusing his own daughter from the time she ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dharmesh @ Dharmendra Karshan Bhandari, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Daman, for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction Under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Testimony of Child Witness and Uncle Found Unreliable.

The appellant, Akhil Ismail Pinjari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistencies in Prosecutrix's Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimonies Failed to Support Allegations of Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Digambar Telang, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian P...