Search Results for "parents dues"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder of Two Minors Under Sections 302, 363, 201 IPC. Circumstantial Evidence and Consecutive Life Sentences Form Core of Appeal; Final Verdict Not Included in Provided Excerpt.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arises out of the judgment dated 30 July 2018 passed by the Special Judge unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove common intention and the chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellants, Deepak Annaraya Metakari (original accused No.1), Ramchandra Mhalappa Petaragi (original accused No.3), and Kamalabai Siddhappa Kothe ...