Search Results for "narcotics"

249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Extension of Investigation Period in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Section 36A(4). Failure to Serve Notice on Accused Before Granting Extension Renders Order Invalid and Accused Entitled to Bail.

The judgment concerns five applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by accused persons in Crime No. 1089/2020 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 21 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before gazetted officer or magistrate.

The appellant, Suleman Oguk @ Soni, was convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) Mandatory Requirement. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Vitiated Trial.

The appellant, Bhola Vijayprasad Gupta, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, on 27.01.2006 in Sessions Trial 4/2003 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Forfeiture of Cash and Fixed Deposits in NDPS Case Despite Acquittal of Accused. Court upholds forfeiture of proceeds of narcotics trafficking under Section 8(c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appellant, Sankapaka Laxman Bhoomaiah @ Babu, was the original accused No.1 in NDPS Special Case No. 208/1989 before the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge in NDPS Case No. 116 of 2000 for an offence under Section 8(c) punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Search of Person Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Recovery of LSD Papers Illegal.

The appellant, Raymond Locke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, in Special Case No. 32/2014 for possession of 1.3 grams of LSD p...