INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5184 OF 2026
31 Jul 2026The matter arose from interim applications filed by The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (CIDCO) seeking impleadment...
Search Results for "materially affected"
425 result(s) found
Found 425 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Caste Validity Certificate and Rejection of Nomination in Lok Sabha Elections — Caste Scrutiny Committee Lacks Power of Review Under Section 7 of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. The Court held that a validity certificate issued under Section 6 of the Act cannot be cancelled by the Committee without express statutory authority and without following principles of natural justice.
24 Sep 2024The petitioner, Rashmi Barve, a Zilla Parishad member, had obtained a caste validity certificate dated 17/02/2020 from the District Caste Certificate ...
- 2736
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Licensee's Suit Against Municipal Corporation for Demolition. Owner is a necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC as the suit directly affects the owner's right to property and the owner has a right to be heard before any order affecting his property is passed.
29 Nov 2023The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict of views among single judges regarding whether the owne...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Second Revision Under Section 154 MCS Act Not Maintainable — Full Bench Overrules Shireen Sami Gadiali. The court ruled that a second revision under the same provision is not maintainable, relying on Supreme Court precedents and the principle of finality.
14 Sep 2023The present reference arose from a writ petition filed by Shilpchintamani Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. challenging an order dated 21.10.2010 pass...
- 79
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
16 Jul 2021The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...
- 154
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.
1 Dec 2020The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging POTA Sanction and Review Committee's Confirmation. Court upholds validity of sanction under Section 45 of POTA and affirms that POTA Review Committee has jurisdiction to confirm or revoke sanction under Section 60 of POTA.
17 Sep 2010The petitioners, who were accused in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevent...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Zilla Parishad Member Challenging Election Disqualification on Age Grounds. School Register Entry Not Conclusive Proof of Age Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.
10 Jun 2010The petitioner, Sou. Manisha Sanjay Waskar, was a member of the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, elected from Panchgaon constituency. Respondent No.1, Anil @...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 35
