Search Results for "limitation under Section 275"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "limitation under Section 275"

194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Petitioner in IPC Marital Rape Exception Challenge; Declares Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC Unconstitutional for Girls Aged 15-18. The Court Held That the Exception Violates Articles 14, 15(3) and 21 of the Constitution by Discriminating Between Married and Unmarried Girls and Disregarding Child Marriage Prohibition.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by Independent Thought, a child rights society, challenging Exception 2 to Section 37...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Promissory Note Execution. The court set aside the trial court's conditional leave order requiring 50% deposit, holding that the defendants raised substantial triable issues under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

26 Mar 2026

The case arises from a summary suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, A. Kanagarajan, against the petitioners/defendants, M/s. Sri MVR Logistics Priv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition, Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Agreement Not Duly Stamped and Insufficiently Stamped, Hence Not Enforceable.

12 Dec 2024

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.16,29,311.74 with interest. The suit was decreed ex parte on 10.04.2018. The defendant No.1 f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Conviction in Non-Compoundable Offences Based on Settlement — Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Can Be Exercised Even After Conviction, Subject to Guidelines. The Court Held That While Section 320 CrPC Restricts Compounding, Section 482 CrPC Provides Independent Power to Quash in the Interest of Justice, and Laid Down Guidelines for Such Exercise.

5 Jan 2021

The judgment arises from a reference made to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve the contentious issue regarding the scope of power und...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple First Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Matter. Dispute Concerns Determination of Compensation for Land Acquired for Nira Deoghar Irrigation Project Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)