SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "licence transfer"
906 result(s) found
Found 906 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Conflicting Decisions in Customs Import Case — Tribunal's Preference for SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. Upheld. The Court held that the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India, which was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, over Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India.
12 Mar 2010The applicant, M/s Mewati & Co., sought clearance of two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit (concentrated whiskey) under a REP license. The Customs o...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
4 Dec 2019The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...
- 200
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case, Rejects Contributory Negligence and Enhances Compensation. Court found trailer driver solely negligent based on FIR and charge sheet, applying preponderance of probabilities standard under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and held learner's licence violation does not establish negligence.
25 Mar 2025The dispute arose from a motor accident on 03.11.1999 involving a Block Development Officer (claimant) riding pillion on a scooter that collided with ...
- 197
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 450
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Challenge to Service Tax on Port Storage Charges. Storage charges collected by Mumbai Port Trust from BPCL for storing petroleum products are taxable as 'port services' under Section 65(105)(zzl) of the Finance Act, 1994.
25 Aug 2022The petitioners, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and its Territory Manager, filed a writ petition challenging the demand of Service Tax by...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Classification Dispute. Rental Income from Property Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Income, Not Income from House Property Under Section 22 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
21 Aug 2012The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the rent a...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Appeal in Eviction and Regularization Case Over Stall Allotment. The dispute involved interpretation of license deed terms and applicability of regularization policies post-transfer of market management to the Council under a government notification.
27 Sep 2021The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the New Delhi Municipal Council against an occupant of a stall at Baba Kharag Singh Marg, New...
- 216
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.
3 Mar 2022The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...
- 314
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Unauthorized Change of Land Use in Leasehold Property — Petitioners Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Tenant Without Prior Permission. Leasehold Property Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Demand for Additional Premium and Penalty Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.
18 Oct 2006The petitioners, Tulsiram Rangwala Trust, Rikhiram T. Arora, and Shivram Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged a demand notice dated 30th March 20...
- 133
