KAHC030058022017_1
13 Jul 2023A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...
Search Results for "labour welfare"
737 result(s) found
Found 737 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Selected Driver Trainees Against NWKRTC, Holding They Are Not Workmen Under Industrial Disputes Act. Court Rules That Selected Candidates Undergoing Training Without Appointment Order or Remuneration Do Not Attain Status of Workman Under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Apr 2024The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.
1 Aug 2026The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Sep 2014The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...
- 235
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.
12 Mar 2015The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.
4 Aug 2006The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.
24 Jan 2011The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act. Provisions Permitting Extended Hours and Spread Over Upheld as Reasonable and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 21.
24 Oct 2016The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved representative union for employees of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Undertaking (BE...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.
28 Oct 2013The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Hospital's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices. The court upheld that unilateral change in service conditions of employees without notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 constitutes unfair labour practice under Items 5, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
5 Jun 2023The case involves a writ petition filed by Bhatiya General Hospital and its CEO against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which found the peti...
- 70
