Search Results for "investigation detention period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "investigation detention period"

634 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 634 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Production of Accused in Taloja Central Prison, Declares Continued Detention Without Production Illegal Under BNSS Section 187 and Article 21. The court held that failure to produce arrested persons before Magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by Section 187 BNSS renders detention illegal and violative of Article 21.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shazaib Sabir Patel, cousin brother of Safvan Abdul Rauf Patel and Afnan Abdul Rauf Patel (Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in FIR No. 0274 of 202...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Prison Authorities Against High Court's Set-Off Order Due to Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. High Court Erred in Entertaining Petition Under Section 482 CrPC When Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 374(2) CrPC Was Available, Reversing Grant of Set-Off Under Section 428 CrPC for Remand Periods.

22 Apr 2025

The appeal was filed by the Superintendent of Prison and Inspector of Police against a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 11.09....

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Refusal of Sanction and Filing of Charge-Sheet After Expiry of Investigation Period. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and not defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet if the accused has already availed the right.

26 Mar 2024

The applicants, Dinesh Ganesh Indre and others, were arrested in connection with CR No. 497 of 2023 registered at Malad Police Station for offences un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail status and relied on stale material.

10 Nov 2023

The petitioner, Asif Shaikh, challenged an order dated 22nd June 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, detaining him under Section 3(2) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Bail and Quashes Police Custody Remand Orders in Prison Corruption Case. Petitioner's Husband, a Police Constable, Granted Bail on Conditions as Investigation Complete and No Further Custodial Interrogation Required.

6 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sadhana Rathod, wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Chargesheet Not Taken Cognizance Within 90 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when the chargesheet is not taken cognizance within the prescribed period, even if physically filed earlier.

23 Feb 2021

The applicant, Wasudeo Shrawan Kamble, was arrested on 13 July 2020 in connection with Crime No. 427/2020 registered at Police Station Ballarshah, Dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order Under Rule 10(2)(a) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 — Suspension Set Aside as Not Based on Detention Beyond 48 Hours. The Court held that the suspension order was invalid because the petitioner was not detained in custody for a period exceeding 48 hours, as required under Rule 10(2)(a), and the order was passed without application of mind.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Vitthal Budho Tayade, was employed as a District Youth Coordinator in the Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan at Thane, Maharashtra. He was ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's retraction of confession and non-supply of the retraction letter violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

19 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Anju Madan Lalwani, wife of Madan Vishindas Lalwani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resolves Conflict on Applicability of Section 167(2)(a)(i) vs (ii) CrPC for Default Bail in Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment. The court held that life imprisonment is a term of not less than ten years, thus the 90-day period under clause (ii) applies.

7 Jul 2006

The case arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court while hearing a bail application filed by two accused persons,...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)