Search Results for "ineffective purchase"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against SAFEMA Forfeiture Based on Invalid Detention Order — Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Quashed as Representation Not Considered Before Revocation, Forfeiture Set Aside

The case involves a challenge to the forfeiture of properties under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Appeals on Validity of Gift Deed and Revocation Deed in Joint Family Property. The Appeals Concern Whether a Gift Deed by a Karta Is Void against Coparceners and Whether a Revocation Deed Is Illegal.

The litigation arose from two suits concerning a house property bearing Municipal No. 8-11-181/800 in Raichur, claimed as joint family property of whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses First Appellate Court's Dismissal on Limitation and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Time was not of essence of contract and suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 51 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Verdict in Arbitration Petition Challenging Award That Set Aside Termination of Oil Terminal Operations Contract. Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Alleges Award is Patently Illegal as Arbitrator Disregarded Contract Terms and Misinterpreted Safety Audit Report.

The dispute arose from an Operating and Services Agreement (OSA) dated 5 May 2015 between HPCL and Aegis for management, operation and maintenance of ...