Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

471 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Institution to Implement Grievance Committee Decision for Retired Employee's Pensionary Benefits. Institution Must Forward Proposal for Monetary Benefits Within Four Weeks.

3 Dec 2013

The petitioner, a retired employee of Respondent No. 7 institution (Milind College of Science, Aurangabad), sought enforcement of a decision passed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Award Holding Section 9A Notice Illegal for Unilateral Change in Vacation Leave Encashment Calculation. Management's change from 30-day divisor to 26-day divisor for computing daily wage for leave encashment held to be a change in service conditions requiring notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Management of Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. (BEML), a Public Sector Undertaking, challenged the award dated 11.09.2013 passed by the Indust...

High Court

Pensionary Benefits for Voluntarily Retired Employees Covered Under Grant-in-Aid Institutions. Employees who opt for voluntary retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits if their institution was on a Grant-in-Aid basis at the time of retirement, even if it was non-grant initially.

7 Oct 2024

Rule Made Returnable (Para 1-2) The petitioner, a full-time lecturer in the Agricultural Development Trust, was appointed in 1993. The institut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

19 Feb 2025

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

20 Mar 2025

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Pension and Gratuity of Retired College Librarian. Petitioner's service from 1991 to 2022 must be considered for retirement benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Vinod Kshirsagar Wasnik, a retired librarian, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to direct the Stat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Retired Teacher in Private Aided School Case — Entire Service Qualifies Despite Pre-Aid Period. Pension Scheme for Private Primary Aided Schools Covers Approved Staff Whose School Subsequently Becomes Aided, as Qualifying Service Includes All Previous Service in Such Schools Under Clause 5(xi) of Circular Dated 31 October 1997.

26 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Anuradha Jayant Gangakhedkar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 7 June 1982 in a Marathi medium primary school conducted by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses RSRTC Appeals, Upholds Pension Rights of Absorbed Employees. Transfer of CPF Amount by Provident Fund Commissioner Satisfies Condition for Pension Under Circular Dated 02.07.1991.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging the judgments of the Rajasthan Hig...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)