Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Pension and Gratuity of Retired College Librarian. Petitioner's service from 1991 to 2022 must be considered for retirement benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vinod Kshirsagar Wasnik, a retired librarian, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to direct the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to grant and release his retirement benefits, including pension and gratuity, based on his last drawn salary and his entire service period from 24 July 1991 to 31 March 2022. The petition was listed in the Special Pension Category Board. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent. The petitioner's counsel, Ms. Devyani Kulkarni, argued that the petitioner had rendered continuous service and was entitled to benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The respondents, represented by Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, Assistant Government Pleader, did not raise substantial objections. The court, comprising Justices Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwini D. Bhobe, allowed the petition, directing the respondents to compute and release the pension and gratuity within a reasonable time. The court held that the petitioner's entire service period must be considered for calculating retirement benefits.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension and Gratuity - Qualifying Service - Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - The petitioner, a librarian, served from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022 and sought retirement benefits. The court held that the entire service period must be considered for calculating pension and gratuity, and directed the respondents to release the benefits within a specified time. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and gratuity based on his entire service period from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022, and whether the respondents are obligated to release such benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute. The respondents are directed to grant and release the retirement benefits including pension and gratuity to the petitioner based on his last drawn salary considering his service period from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022, within a reasonable time.

Law Points

  • Pension
  • Gratuity
  • Retirement Benefits
  • Qualifying Service
  • Last Drawn Salary
  • Writ of Mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 154

Writ Petition No. 3122 of 2023

2025-09-25

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Ashwini D. Bhobe

2025:BHC-AS:42736-DB

Ms. Devyani Kulkarni with Ms. Sanskruti Yagnik for the Petitioner, Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, State.

Vinod Kshirsagar Wasnik

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Higher Education Maharashtra State, The Joint Director of Higher Education Konkan Division, Sheth J.N.Paliwala Commerce, Arts & Science College, Sudhagad Education Society

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for release of pension and gratuity.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to grant and release retirement benefits including pension and gratuity based on last drawn salary and service from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022.

Filing Reason

Non-release of retirement benefits despite service from 1991 to 2022.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and gratuity for his entire service period from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he served continuously from 24.07.1991 to 31.03.2022 and is entitled to retirement benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Respondents did not raise substantial objections.

Ratio Decidendi

A retired employee is entitled to pension and gratuity based on the entire qualifying service rendered, and the state is obligated to release such benefits under the applicable pension rules.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition is listed in the Special Pension Category Board. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (a) and (b), as under : ...

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2023, listed in the Special Pension Category Board, and heard finally on 25 September 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Bank's Auction Sale of Property for Recovery of Dues. Court holds that sale of property by a co-operative bank under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is not a 'sale' u...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Bid in Mining Lease e-Auction, Orders Fresh Auction and Penalty. Supreme Court finds error in 140.10% bid to be a genuine mistake, mandates a fresh e-auction while imposing a Rs 3 crore penalty on appellant for lack of due ...