Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Sep 2019...
Search Results for "flat rate"
925 result(s) found
Found 925 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests, which was contrary to the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum, and that the award of costs was without reasons.
27 Jan 2017The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.
13 Jan 2026The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Waiver of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner failed to deposit unutilized capital gains in specified account, leading to levy of interest.
25 Oct 2016The petitioner, Humayun Suleman Merchant, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 5th October 2004 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Incom...
- 103
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.
21 Jan 2022The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...
- 187
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.
17 Apr 2026The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.
24 Jul 2012The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree Under Section 13A(1) of Bombay Rent Act for Bona Fide Requirement of Landlord's Son. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Section 115 CPC as No Jurisdictional Error Found.
11 Aug 2005The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the eviction decree pass...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for New Bombay Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 15 per sq m Instead of Rs. 30 per sq m. Court holds that reliance on a prior judgment without establishing comparability of land is insufficient for enhancement under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
18 Feb 2011The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 17th September 1993 passed by the learned Joint District Judge in a reference u...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Flat Booking Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a flat dismissed as the alleged agreement was oral and not evidenced by any written document signed by the parties.
13 Dec 2011The appellant, Jamnadas Mathradas, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement to purchase a flat from the respondents. He claimed t...
- 44
