Search Results for "facilitation"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Office Note Requiring Courier Companies' Authorized Signatories to Hold 'F' Card, 'G' Card or Kardex Number and Pass Examinations Under CHALR 2004. Courier Regulations Not Exempt from Customs Broker Licensing Requirements Under CHALR 2004/CBLR 2013.

The Couriers Association of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.

The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on Subsequent Year's Assessment Order Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The Petitioner, Sitara Diamond Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 20 June 2011 issued u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Retrospective Promotion and Back Wages for Master's Post — Exoneration Does Not Automatically Entitle to Retrospective Promotion or Back Wages Without Specific Order.

The petitioner, Lt. Cdr. Alok Verma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the Shipping Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...