High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "excess work"
1448 result(s) found
Found 1448 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Government Employee — Holds That Time-Bound Promotion Granted Prior to Cut-Off Date Is Protected Under Government Resolution. The Court set aside the recovery of Rs.63,765/- and restored the appellant's pension as originally fixed, finding that the Government Resolution dated 8th February 1999 protected promotions granted before 31st December 1995.
21 Aug 2024The appellant, Jagdish Prasad Singh, was appointed as Supply Inspector in the Government of Bihar in 1966. He received a time-bound promotion as Marke...
- 697
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.
8 Apr 2021The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to Regularization of Daily Wage Safai Kamgars. Industrial Court's Order to Confer Permanent Status Upheld as Employees Worked Continuously and Were Denied Benefits Unfairly.
20 Feb 2024The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by the Alibag Municipal Council and its Chief Officer challenging orders of the Industrial Court date...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act Held Not Maintainable for Lack of Jurisdictional Error.
2 Jan 2024The petitioner, Rohit Dembiwal, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Mar 2013Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Territorial Jurisdiction Dispute — Suit for Recovery of Excess Payment Filed in Wrong Court. District Court's Return of Plaint for Want of Jurisdiction Upheld as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Cause of Action Accrual in Goa Under Section 20 CPC.
26 Jun 2019The appellant, Ocean Marine Environment Coatings Private Limited, filed a commercial appeal challenging the judgment and order of the District and Ses...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery from Retired Employee's Leave Salary in BMC Case — Unauthorized Deduction Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. The Court held that recovery from leave salary without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and directed release of dues.
12 Jan 2017The petitioner, Smt. Arpita Ashok Kane, was a retired employee of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), having served as a Head Telephone Oper...
- 70
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Even if Used for Exempted Goods Prior to Common Use. The court held that the restriction under Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply when capital goods are used for both exempted and dutiable goods, and the assessee is entitled to credit if the goods are used in the manufacture of final products.
20 Jun 2018The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders of...
- 115
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates upon Writ Petitions Challenging Re-Assessment Proceedings for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Court Analyzes Whether Notices are Barred by Limitation and Whether Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts.
19 Dec 2023The petitioner, EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewlett Packard Globalsoft Private Limited), a company engaged in export of software services a...
- 25
