Search Results for "enquiry mandatory"

2159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MAT Order Quashing Appointment of Police Patil. Non-Submission of Character Certificate Held as Curable Irregularity, Not Fatal to Appointment.

The petitioner, Avinash Shankar Bavne, was appointed as Police Patil of Village Gondeda on 4 March 2016 after a recruitment process. Respondent No. 3,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Reinstatement Order - Upholds University's Compulsory Retirement of Junior Engineer for Serious Misconduct Under Maharashtra Universities Standard Code Rules

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioners challenging the University and College Tribunal's order that had set aside the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Sub-Inspector in Police Act Case — Superintendent of Police Holds Same Authority as District Superintendent. Re-employed Deputy Superintendent of Police Qualifies as Superior Officer for Departmental Enquiry Under Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

Background: The case concerned the dismissal of a Sub-Inspector of Police from service by the Delhi Police Force in 1949. The respondent, originally a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order for Recovery of Rs. 2398.80 Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disciplinary Rules

The petitioner, a junior engineer with  Respondent, challenged a disciplinary order dated 14/05/2019 imposing recovery of Rs. 2398.80 for alleged...