Search Results for "district consumer commission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "district consumer commission"

435 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal in Medical Negligence Case — Remands to State Commission for Fresh Consideration on Merits After Condoning Delay. Limitation Period for Appeal Calculated from Date of Receipt of Certified Copy, and Delay of 55 Days Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause.

31 Jul 2025

The case arises from a complaint of medical negligence and deficiency in service filed by Sh. Fateh Singh (the petitioner) against Delhi Commonwealth ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Mob Damage Claim — National Commission's Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. The Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the National Commission failed to properly address the appellant's objections and the surveyor's report.

17 May 2023

The appellant, National Insurance Company Ltd., challenged the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, which allow...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Against Company in Liquidation — Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum Barred After Appointment of Official Liquidator Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that once a winding up order is passed, the Company Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the company's assets, and the Consumer Forum cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Sandhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking to quash orders dated 17.10.2006, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Consumer Commission Order and Bailable Warrants Against NBFC in Moratorium Period — Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Moratorium Bars Continuation of Proceedings Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, SREI Equipment Finance Limited, a non-banking financial corporation, challenged an order dated 20.07.2022 passed by the District Consu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Consumer Complaint Against Advocates for Lack of Merit and Delay. Advocates Not Liable for Deficiency in Service When Case Lost on Merits Without Evidence of Negligence Under Consumer Protection Act.

8 Nov 2021

The dispute originated from consumer complaints filed by the petitioner against BSNL before the District Consumer Forum, which were dismissed on merit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Consumer Case Over Exim Policy Incentives. Exporter Not a Consumer as Government Does Not Render Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Ministry of Commerce against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute, Interpreting Limitation Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) bars recovery of additional charges from the date the sum first became due, based on billing error, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

5 Oct 2021

The dispute arose when the appellant, a cotton yarn manufacturer in Panipat, Haryana, received a short assessment notice from the electricity distribu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order on Medical Negligence Compensation but Leaves Jurisdictional Issue Open. The Court affirmed the award against Safdarjung Hospital due to the small compensation amount and lack of factual challenge, while clarifying that the question of jurisdiction under Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, remains undecided for future cases.

23 Jul 2020

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 7 October 2016, which held Safdarjung Hospital lia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

23 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Cost Escalation by Development Authority in Consumer Dispute — Clause 7 of Allotment Letter Permitted Price Revision. The Court held that the allotment was not a fixed price contract and the authority acted fairly by granting interest on deposits.

30 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 November 2017, which had directed the Visakhap...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)