Search Results for "discriminatory levy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "discriminatory levy"

209 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Notification Levying Central Excise on Tobacco Products — Notification No.3/2019-Central Excise dated 06.07.2019 held valid and within powers under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the government has the power to modify or withdraw exemptions in public interest and that promissory estoppel does not apply to legislative functions.

21 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by manufacturers and dealers of tobacco and tobacco products, challenging Notification No.3/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Amendment to Section 10(3) of KVAT Act, 2005 — Restriction on Input Tax Credit for Inter-State Purchases Upheld. The court held that the amendment is a valid legislative measure to prevent tax evasion and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

29 Mar 2016

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies, including Sonal Apparel Private Limited and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Priv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

10 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Demand for Transfer Fees and Unilateral Imposition of Fresh Lease Terms. Lease Renewal Must Be on Existing Terms Unless Mutually Agreed, and Transfer of Leasehold Interest Does Not Attract Transfer Fees Without Specific Statutory Provision.

5 Aug 2022

The petitioners, ten individuals and a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of the Na...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

4 Oct 2016

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Reserves Judgment in Revenue Appeals Concerning Tax Exemption on Land Acquisition Compensation. The Bench Considers if Section 96 of the 2013 Act Applies to Acquisitions under the Karnataka Highways Act.

29 Oct 2024

The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Bengaluru, filed five intra-court writ appeals under section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

8 Apr 2026

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)