Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

1878 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1878 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Demand and Acceptance. The Trial Court’s Acquittal Under Prevention of Corruption Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Recovery of Bribe Money Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal arose from the acquittal of the respondent, a Talathi (Class III government servant), by the Special Judge for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Based on Sufficient Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe, Despite Hostile Witnesses, Upholds Trial Court Verdict.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Training Officer in a Government ITI College, Saundatti, for demanding and accepting a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Challenging Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Accused Surveyor Had Been Found Guilty of Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Conducting Land Survey.

This criminal appeal was preferred by a Second Division Surveyor against his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by the trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Challenging Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Bribe Demand. Appellant, a Clerk, Claims Amount Was Deposited for Small Savings, Not Bribe, in Case Involving Sections 7 and 13 of the Act.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Clerk in the Tahsil Office, Jalna, by the Special Judge, Jalna in Special Case No. 35/...