Search Results for "delivery of possession"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Consumer Case Against Builder for Delayed Possession. Builder's Failure to Deliver Villa by Agreed Date Constitutes Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves an appeal by Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and another against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Execution of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Sale Consideration. Doctrine of Merger Applies When Appellate Court Confirms Trial Court Decree Without Modifying Time Limit.

The appellant, Surinder Pal Soni, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 8 December 2003 for agricultural land in Panchku...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...