Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation or Proximate Link. Allegations of harassment for loan repayment do not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC as there was no direct instigation or active role in driving the deceased to suicide.

The judgment pertains to a criminal writ petition and two criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Offenders Act Case — Lack of Proximate Link Between Past Crimes and Public Order Disturbance. Single Pending Murder Case Insufficient to Justify 'Goonda' Detention When Bail Already Granted and No Charge-Sheet Filed.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the preventive detention order against Khaja Bilal Ahmed, who was detained under the Telangana Preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Did Not Show Prejudicial Activity After Release.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Chandrakant Prabhakar Todankar, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra ...