Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of IGST Act Provisions on Intermediary Services in Third Judge Reference. The court considered whether Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which deems the place of supply of intermediary services as the location of the supplier, is constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.

18 Apr 2023

The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of MEIS Benefits on Ground of Mis-declaration of Intent. Court holds that mere mis-declaration of intent without specific provision in Foreign Trade Policy cannot be a ground to deny export incentives under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme.

2 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Portescap India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Non-Speaking Order of Central Government in Excise Revision and Remands for Fresh Decision. Government's Rejection of Revision Under Section 36 of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, Without Reasons, Held Invalid as It Failed to Provide Judicial Consideration and Disclosure of Materials.

28 Oct 1969

The case arose from a dispute over excise duty liability on a chemical compound produced by the appellant company, which the authorities classified as...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

30 Apr 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Modvat Credit Lapse Provisions in Finance Act, 1999. Retrospective Validation of Rules Causing Lapse of Accumulated Credit Upheld as Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

23 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Coral Cosmetics Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered as a Small Scale Industry, was engaged in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)