Search Results for "construction loans"

437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Prescribing Fees for Permission to Mortgage Occupancy Class II Lands. Condition Imposing Payment of Fees Held Valid Under Section 43 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Not Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in paper manufacturing, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporate Debtor Against Banks in SARFAESI Act Proceedings — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act as Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Exists.

The appellant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed various credit facilities from a consortiu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate Against Guarantor in Cooperative Bank Loan Fraud Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Documents and Pass Reasoned Order Renders Recovery Proceedings Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarulata Amritlal Bava, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Recovery Certificate dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...