Search Results for "consortium agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "consortium agreement"

284 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Truck Driver and Proper Application of Multiplier. The Court set aside the finding of contributory negligence and recalculated compensation using correct multiplier and future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

23 Aug 2025

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 20.12.2013 involving a truck and a motorcycle. The deceased, Prakash Jadhav, was riding a motor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes DRT/DRAT Orders Allowing Sale of Mortgaged Property Below Reserve Price — Unsecured Creditor Cannot Be Treated as Secured Creditor with Priority Over Mortgagee. The court held that treating an unsecured creditor as a secured creditor with priority over the mortgagee is a fundamental fallacy, and directed a fresh auction in accordance with law.

18 Mar 2024

The writ petition was filed by Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. (ARCIL), the beneficiary of a mortgage over Flat No. 61, Basant Apartment, M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Ex-Employee Challenging DRT Proceedings for Recovery of Alleged Loss Due to Misconduct. The Core Issue Is Whether Such Loss Constitutes a 'Debt' Within the Meaning of Section 2(g) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

21 Apr 2023

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Companies in Electricity Regulatory Dispute - Upholds APTEL's Direction for Merits-Based Disposal of Tariff Determination and Power Purchase Agreement Approval Petitions. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Correctly Ordered State Commission to Decide Petitions on Merits After State Commission Allowed Withdrawal of One Petition and Dismissed the Other, Ensuring Statutory Functions Under Electricity Act, 2003 Are Fulfilled.

2 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute between Distribution Companies (DISCOMS) and Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (HNPCL) regarding power purcha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings Against Dr. Vijay Mallya. Court upholds the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal to proceed with recovery actions under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on pending criminal proceedings and alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction.

5 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in recovery proceedin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Upholds Appellant Bank in Debenture Trustee Suit, Holding Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred by RDB Act. Bank Acting as Debenture Trustee for Recovery of Debentureholders' Dues Is Not a 'Debt Due to Bank' Under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Suit Maintainable on Original Side.

7 Mar 2016

The litigation arose from a suit filed in February 2002 by a banking company acting as a debenture trustee for recovery of Rs. 997 lacs together with ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examined the legality of referring a cable business dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court considered whether the trial court correctly referred the dispute despite allegations of fraud and the contention that the arbitration clause did not cover the parties.

26 Jul 2013

The dispute arose between cable operators in Nagpur who had formed a consortium called 'City Cable Vision' (CCV) and entered into a Memorandum of Unde...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)