Search Results for "composite Bombay State"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "composite Bombay State"

526 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teachers Seeking Pension Revision Based on 6th Pay Commission. Held that Hakim Committee Recommendations Not Applicable to Teaching Staff and Pre-2006 Retirees Not Entitled to Revised Pension.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, an association of superannuated teachers, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the recommendations of the Hakim committee ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Deceased Engineer. Contributory Negligence Not Established; Tribunal's Assessment of Income, Multiplier, and Dependency Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

12 Jul 2013

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 31-07-2006 passed by the Motor A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Fatal Road Accident Case — Identity of Driver Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal for Offences Under Sections 304A, 279 and 337 of Indian Penal Code Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish That Accused Was Driving the Truck at the Time of Incident.

25 Jun 2012

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, dated 13.3.2000, which set aside the conviction of the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Rule 8 Loss Set-Off Held Invalid. The court held that Rule 8 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 applies to both income and loss, and loss from plantation division is a business loss allowable under Rule 8.

1 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-2005 on 29 October 2004, showing net profit before tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening — No Locus Standi Found as Society Was Not Owner of Land at Time of Acquisition. The court held that a party cannot challenge acquisition proceedings if it was not the owner at the time of acquisition.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acqu...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)