Search Results for "certificate under Article 133"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "certificate under Article 133"

382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.

23 Nov 2005

The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Mutation Entries and Communications Vesting Wakf Properties in Custodian of Enemy Property; Holds Consent Order Binding on Custodian. Court Declares That Once a Consent Order Withdraws a Vesting Certificate Under the Enemy Property Act, 1968, the Custodian Cannot Subsequently Claim Vesting Without Fresh Adjudication.

22 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed three writ petitions challenging the communications and mutation entries by which the Custodian of Enemy Property sought...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Selected Driver Trainees Against NWKRTC, Holding They Are Not Workmen Under Industrial Disputes Act. Court Rules That Selected Candidates Undergoing Training Without Appointment Order or Remuneration Do Not Attain Status of Workman Under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

10 Dec 2019

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

High Court

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging TDS Provisions — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 194C, 194J, and 206AA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provisions are not arbitrary or discriminatory and that TRACES is a valid administrative mechanism.

26 Aug 2016

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by various assessees, including individuals and companies, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging State Transport Department's Order. Petitioners Assail Government Decision Dated 05.08.2015 on Grounds of Illegality Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules.

3 May 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

18 Dec 2015

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)