Search Results for "cement production"

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Education Society Challenging Quashing of Teacher's Termination. Termination Based on Alleged Caste Fraud Set Aside as Employee's Caste Certificate Was Valid and No Misrepresentation Proven.

The petitioners, Pratibha Niketan Education Society and Pratibha Niketan High School, Nanded, challenged the judgment and order dated 21/08/2015 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Property Dispute Between Heirs and Legatee. Will dated 7.1.1997 executed by Joao Francisco Lobo in favour of plaintiff No.1 held valid, dismissing appeals by both parties.

The dispute concerns a property at Calangute known as 'Sullachi Nhat' with a house, originally belonging to Joao Francisco Lobo and his wife. Joao Fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. The court held that the Will was not proved but the defendants failed to prove adverse possession, remanding for fresh consideration.

The dispute concerns a property at Calangute known as 'Sullachi Nhat' with a house, originally owned by Joao Francisco Lobo and his wife Joanita Lobo....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to prove execution of will and defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Carlos Tavora and others) and the defendants (Maria Felicidade Fernandes e Lobo and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. The court upheld the validity of a Will and rejected the claim of adverse possession by co-owners, holding that possession must be hostile and with ouster to ripen into title.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sullachi Nhat' in Calangute, Goa. The plaintiffs claimed title through a Will executed by Joao Francisco ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Property Dispute, Dismisses Claims of Undue Influence and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. The court held that the propounder of a will must prove its execution and attestation, and once that is done, the onus shifts to those alleging undue influence or fraud.

The case involves a dispute over a property known as 'Sullachi Nhat' in Calangute, Goa, originally owned by Joao Francisco Lobo and his wife Joanita L...