Search Results for "ceiling proceedings"

578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals and Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Government's Vesting of Excess Land Under Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. Landowner's Challenge Fails as Proceedings Were Initiated Prior to Repeal and No Final Order Was Passed Under Section 9(5) of the Act.

The case involves multiple writ appeals and writ petitions challenging the vesting of excess land under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Petitioner Challenging Membership Grant Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 -- Lease Conditions and Statutory Amendments Upheld in Favor of Respondents

The petitioner society filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging orders that granted membership to respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Repeal Case Based on Possession Taken Over. Vesting Under Section 11(3) of Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 Saved as Land Owner Voluntarily Surrendered Possession, Satisfying Section 3 of Repeal Act, 1999.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and officials from the Department of Urban Land Ceiling, challenging o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Computation Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court's Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction to Determine Entitlement to Higher Gratuity Rate.

The case involves a dispute over gratuity computation between Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceuticals Corporation Ltd. (the petitioner) and its retired employee,...