KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "board representation"
2361 result(s) found
Found 2361 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981. Approval and Confirmation Orders Held Valid as Issued by Empowered Officer; Detenu's Representation Found to Have Been Duly Considered.
4 May 2005The case involved a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of D...
High Court
Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.
28 Feb 2019The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...
- 16
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Director in BESCOM Board Without Hearing. Impugned Order Quashed for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
21 Oct 2019The petitioner, G Ashok Kumar, was working as Managing Director of Karnataka Vidyuth Karkane and was also a nominated Director (Technical) on the Boar...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. The Court held that the 60-day delay in considering the detenue's representation by the Central Government was unexplained and vitiated the detention order.
15 May 2023The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activi...
- 228
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachment in Writ of Mandamus — Statutory Authority Must Act Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the court directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation regarding removal of shops from Survey No.314.
23 Jan 2025The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...
- 40
High Court
- 39
High Court
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.
23 Mar 2022The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...
- 85
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows TNEB Appeal in Dearness Allowance Dispute — Board Bound by Settlement to Follow State Government DA Rates. Employees Cannot Claim Higher DA Based on Central Government Rates When Settlement Links DA to State Government Rates.
13 Feb 2019The appeals arise from a dispute between the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Board) and its employees' unions regarding the payment of Dearness Allowanc...
- 339
