KAHC010220972024_1
20 Jul 2026These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"
1374 result(s) found
Found 1374 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Section 9 Petition in Housing Society-Developer Arbitration Amidst Numerous Interim Applications. Interim Measures Including Attachment of Assets and Deposit of Over Rs. 11 Crores Ordered Earlier Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act.
29 Apr 2026The case involved a commercial arbitration petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with thirty-one interim...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.
6 Apr 2026The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator. Court holds that non-payment of stamp duty on agreement does not render arbitration agreement void ab initio, and that the issue of stamping is for the arbitrator to decide under Section 11(6A) of the Act.
10 Nov 2025The appellant, Iqbal Trading Company, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated Octob...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Jan 2025The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 639
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.
5 Mar 2024The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...
- 659
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jul 2013The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Feb 2013The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...
- 96
