Search Results for "agricultural produce marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "agricultural produce marketing"

227 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SIT Investigation into Market Committee Affairs. Government Order Appointing Special Investigating Team for Inquiry into Alleged Irregularities in Agricultural Produce Market Committee Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

10 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were executive committee members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur, challenged a Government order dated 18/07/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

23 Apr 2024

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination in APMC Election Due to Proposer's Disqualification. Nomination Rejection Set Aside as Proposer's Disqualification Under Section 45(2A) of Maharashtra APMC Act Not Applicable to Traders' Constituency.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Navandar Nandlal Hiralal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination form for the election to the Agricultural ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC Executive Committee for Violation of Natural Justice — Order Passed Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 77(5) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Invalid. The Court held that the power under Section 77(5) is quasi-judicial and requires compliance with principles of natural justice, including a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing.

24 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Santosh Tale, a member of the Executive Committee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Khamgaon, challenged an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Market Committee. Minister's order set aside for being unreasoned and without consideration of material on record under Section 45 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Dipraj P. Ilamkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19.09.2018 passed by the Minister for Co-operation, Government...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, for want of notice and hearing, directing fresh exercise after compliance with natural justice.

28 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Kishanrao Sarjerao More, filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of several cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jan 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against APMC President for Violating Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(3) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. The court held that the notice period of 12 days from 17.10.2013 to 29.10.2013 was invalid as it did not provide the required 15 clear days.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Tharadevi, was the President of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Batawade, Tumkur. On 30.09.2013, 12 elected mem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

17 Jun 2011

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)