Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

1777 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1777 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff's Claim of Bonafide Purchase Fails as Prior Decree in O.S.No.34 of 1984 Was Binding and Sale Deeds Were Executed During Pendency of Litigation.

The appellant, H.Prema Devakumari, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction. She claimed to have purchased plot No.9 fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Auction Purchaser for Electricity Supply Without Paying Previous Owner's Dues. Auction purchaser of industrial property is not liable for outstanding electricity charges of previous consumer under Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Zia Iron Store, purchased an industrial property at N-69, M.I.D.C., Nagpur in an auction conducted in execution of an award of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission's Compensation Award Against Builder for Delayed Possession in Housing Project. Builder's 'Endeavour' Clause Interpreted as Requiring Reasonable Efforts, and Contractual Compensation Rate Held Unfair Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a delayed housing project where the builder, NBCC (India) Limited, failed to hand over possession of a residential unit to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of First Appellate Court's Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. High Court Had Directed Refund of Earnest Money Instead of Specific Performance, Holding That Appellant Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The litigation arose from an agreement for sale dated 08.01.2010, whereby the defendants agreed to sell two items of immovable property to the appella...