Search Results for "advocate duty"

10132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears an Application Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondents Resist Appointment of Arbitrator on Ground That Issues Were Already Adjudicated by Order Dated January 31, 2022.

The case concerned an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Vijay Sharma seeking appointment of an arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner Club to Permit Mobile Phone Usage at Race Courses Without Additional Entertainment Duty. The Court held that mobile phone use is not entertainment under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no additional duty is leviable.

The petitioner, The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., conducts horse races in Mumbai and Pune under a license from the State of Maharashtra under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Charter Party Dispute Over Detention Charges. Arbitration agreement held valid and arbitrable despite respondent's objections regarding limitation and non-signing of charter party.

The applicant, Alliance Import and Export, a partnership firm, filed two arbitration applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Recovery Case — Customs Authorities Cannot Recover Duty Dehors Sections 28 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Duty on Confiscated Goods Not Recoverable When Redemption Option Not Exercised.

The Bombay High Court, in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, considered two substantial questions of law: whether customs authoriti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unstamped MOU. Stamp Objection Is for Arbitral Tribunal to Decide, Not a Bar to Appointment of Arbitrator.

The applicants, Nilesh Shantilal Tank and Praful Shantilal Tank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...