Search Results for "Yerwada Central Prison"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Yerwada Central Prison"

210 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents — Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of In-Camera Statements and Grounds of Detention Renders Detention Order Invalid Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of Statements and In-Camera Statements Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 29th January 2026 passed by the Distri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act Case — Detenu's Right to Make Representation Not Effectively Communicated. Failure to Inform Detenu of His Right to Make Representation to the Advisory Board and the State Government Renders Detention Order Invalid Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur, under Section 3 of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act Due to Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Vitiated as Statements Not Independently Verified.

9 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sourabh Kalu Koli, challenged an order of detention dated 7th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kolhapur (Respondent No.2)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Under MPDA Act — In-Camera Statements Verified by Authorized Officer Sufficient. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act upheld as statements of confidential witnesses were verified by Assistant Commissioner of Police and found genuine.

7 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Rohit @ Karan s/o Purshottam Naukariya, was detained by an order dated 22/12/2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City (r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Link Between Bootlegging and Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and establish a clear nexus between the alleged activities and public order, which was absent in this case.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anil Preetam Kumbhar, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune on 6 April 2018 under the Maharashtra Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Single Robbery Incident — Preventive Detention Not Warranted When Ordinary Criminal Law is Sufficient. The court held that a solitary incident of robbery simplicitor cannot form the basis for branding a person as a 'dangerous person' under Section 3 of the MPDA Act, 1981, and the detention order was passed mechanically without application of mind.

19 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Sagar @ Lalu Bhoju Rathod, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Wife for Murder of Husband and Daughter under Section 302 IPC — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the chain of circumstances including motive, last seen together, recovery of weapon, and false explanation established guilt.

16 Sep 2013

The appellant, Anjali Sudhakar Chumbalkar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her husband Sudhakar Chumbalkar and her daughter Vars...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Juvenile Benefit Claim After Final Conviction Under Section 7A of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. Claim of Juvenility Can Be Raised at Any Stage Even After Final Disposal; Court Must Determine Age and Forward Juvenile to Board.

17 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sunil s/o Laxman Javade, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code by judgment and order dated 08....

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

6 May 2010

The appellant, Rambahadur Bhimsingh Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on 17th July 2002 for the murder of o...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)