Search Results for "Voluntary Payments"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landlord's Application for Possession and Rent Arrears from Official Liquidator in Company Liquidation. Landlord's Claim for Rent Arrears and Possession Upheld Under Section 476 of Companies Act, 1956.

The applicant, Shri N R Ravi, claimed to be the owner of a property leased to M/s. SEM India Systems Private Limited (in liquidation) on 15.05.2008. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Housing Society's Petition Challenging Refund Order in Cooperative Dispute. Society's Demand of Rs.5,00,000 for Transfer Regularization Held Unjustified and Directed to Refund Rs.4,75,000 with Interest.

The petitioner, Alankar Sahkari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, a housing society, challenged the order dated 12th December, 2013 passed by the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Workmen Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of 18 workmen by M/s. Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. held illegal for non-compliance with mandatory retrenchment provisions.

The petitioners, 18 workmen, were employed by M/s. Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. They were terminated without any notice or retrenchment compensation. ...