Search Results for "Voluntarily causing hurt"

279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault on Public Servant in ST Stand Incident. Accused Convicted Under Sections 323, 332, 353 IPC for Assaulting Bus Conductor During Duty Hours.

The revision application was filed by the son of the original accused, Balasaheb Nivrutti Jagtap, who died during the pendency of the criminal appeal....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC for Causing Hurt by Wooden Plank, Reduces Sentence Due to Long Pendency. Accused struck deceased on head with wooden plank causing death, but murder charge not proven; sentence reduced to period already undergone.

The appellant, Dhondu s/o Patru Waghmare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code for v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Grievous Hurt in Night-Time Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of Gangaram Kokre and Section 324 IPC for causing hurt to Dhau Shingade, based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Bhaskar Janu Khadme, was convicted by the learned Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, for offences under Sections 302 and 324 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Allegation of Throwing Burning Kerosene Lamp Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Case Under Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The case arises from an incident on 18.3.2008 (Holi day) where the victim Rakesh Mankar, an 18-year-old student, sustained burn injuries. The prosecut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...