Search Results for "Vesting Notification"

368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Private Forest Vesting Case — Land Classified as Private Forest Under Section 2(c-i)(f) of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 Vests in State; No Evidence of Cultivation Produced.

The petitioner, Gaurakshan Sanstha, a public trust established in 1962 for Panjarpole purposes, owned agricultural land in various villages. In 1985, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Before Repeal. Application for Exemption Under Section 20 Rejected as Land Had Vested in State; No Abatement Upon Repeal.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing a writ petition challenging the rejection of an exemption application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute. Plaintiff's Ownership Upheld Based on Concurrent Findings of Fact Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the Union of India and other defendants against the judgment of the appellate court which declared the resp...