Search Results for "Unauthorised Occupation"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Mandamus to Re-erect Shed Demolished by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Establish Right to Re-erection After Demolition of Dilapidated Structure Without Proper Permission.

The petitioner, Shriram Ramphal Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus against the Mun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...