Search Results for "Taxing Statute"

251 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of VAT and Unclaimed Purchases in Taxable Turnover Calculation. State of Gujarat's Appeal Dismissed; High Court and Tribunal's Interpretation of GVAT Act Affirmed

The Appellant challenged the High Court of Gujarat's judgment affirming the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal's (Tribunal) decision in favor of Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT Circular Denying Adjustment of TDS Against Tax Payable Under Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. Circular No. 755 dated 25-07-1997 Held Ultra Vires as It Imposed Restriction Not Found in Finance Act, 1997 or Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and its director, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...