Search Results for "Tata Capital Limited"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Tata Capital Limited"

231 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 231 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Misconduct Proved but Punishment Disproportionate. Labour Court's Discretion Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

29 Jul 2024

The petitioner-employer, a company manufacturing fuel injection equipment, challenged an Award dated 13 December 2023 of the First Labour Court, Nashi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Coal Import Tender Bid as Non-Responsive for Arbitrary Reasons. Subsidiary Company Cannot be Disqualified Based on Parent Company’s Contract Termination When Tender Conditions Do Not Explicitly Bar Reliance on Parent’s Experience, Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

29 Jan 2024

The petitioner, a subsidiary company engaged in coal import and supply, challenged a communication by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited rejectin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act Case, Overturning High Court's Grant of First Right of Refusal. The Court Held That Section 11 of the Act Does Not Confer a First Right of Refusal and Upheld the Competitive Bidding Process for Appointing a Mine Developer-cum-Operator.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions concerning a dispute over the interpretation of Section 11 of the ...

High Court

KAHC010218752018_1

20 Sep 2021

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement. Invoices Relied Upon by Distributors Did Not Contain Arbitration Clause, and No Other Agreement Was Produced.

30 Oct 2015

The judgment involves multiple arbitration petitions filed by various distributors (petitioners) against Elder Pharmaceuticals Limited (respondent) se...

High Court

KAHC020032022013_1

30 Apr 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

13 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BIFR Order in SICA Reference — Holds That BIFR Cannot Reopen a Duly Sanctioned Scheme Without Jurisdiction Under Section 18 of SICA. The court quashed the BIFR order reopening a sanctioned scheme, ruling that the BIFR lacks inherent powers to review or modify a final scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 25.1.2011 passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.

7 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)